Legal Opinion

Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided February 6, 1985No. 72 E.D. Appeal Docket, 1984PublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

FLAHERTY, Justice.

We granted the petition for allowance of appeal of an employer and its insurance carrier under the Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act, Act of June 2, 1915, P.L. 736, art. 1, § 101, et seq., as amended, 77 P.S. § 1, et seq. (hereinafter “the Act”), to determine the relative rights and liabilities of an employer and a Workmen’s Compensation claimant (1) under an illegal subrogation agreement, and (2) for attorney’s fees in connection with (a) successful prosecution of a third-party tort action and (b) subsequent pro*595ceedings under the Act. This matter…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Leaseway Systems, Inc. v. Commonwealth, Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Bair v. Susquehanna Collieries Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Rollins Outdoor Advertising v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Dasconio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Pennsylvania Manufacturers' Ass'n v. WolfeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. PMA Insurance Group v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. P & R Welding & Fabricating v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Pendleton v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API