Legal Opinion

Perkins v. Sykes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 1951No. 747PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWiNBORNE, J.

The decisions of this Court uniformly hold that a party, moving in apt time and under the provisions of G.S. 1-220 to set aside a judgment taken against him, on the ground of surprise or excusable neglect, not only must show surprise or excusable neglect, but also must make it appear that he has a meritorious defense to plaintiff’s cause of action. Dunn v. Jones, 195 N.C. 354, 142 S.E. 320; Hooks v. Neighbors, 211 N.C. 382, 190 S.E. 236; Johnson v. Sidbury, 225 N.C. 208, 34 S.E. 2d 67; Craver v. Spaugh, 226 N.C. 450, 38 S.E. 2d 525; Whitaker v. Raines, 226 N.C. 526, 39 S.E. 2d 266; Hanford v.…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. McGill v. Town of LumbertonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  2. Town of Burnsville v. BooneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Hanford v. McSwainSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Johnson v. . SidburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Simmons v. LeeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. GrundlerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  2. In Re BlalockSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Moore v. DealSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Smith v. BryantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  5. Stafford v. DickisonHawaii Supreme Court · 1962

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API