Legal Opinion

People v. Martin

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided August 29, 2018No. 2d Crim. No. B283097PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYegan, J.

*507The fabric of the law will stretch only so far before it will unravel. Here, a professional thief entered in to an international conspiracy to commit as many petty thefts as she could get away with. She was foiled by security guards and the police. She seeks to stretch Proposition 47 to cover her conspiracy to commit petty theft. She convinced the trial court. But it just won't stretch that far. It is difficult, if not impossible, to believe that the electorate intended that a person, such as respondent, with five prior separate prison terms who joined an international conspiracy to commit…

2Cases cited38 opinions

  1. Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Dyna-Med, Inc. v. Fair Employment & Housing CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Abelleira v. District Court of AppealCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Callanan v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. People v. BuycksCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018

33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. ValenzuelaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
  2. People v. Brown, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019
  3. (HC) Koenig v. KoenigDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Nazir v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2022
  5. People v. BrownCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API