Legal Opinion

Balint v. Grayson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1962No. 173PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant makes seven assignments of error. They do not conform to the rules of this Court.

The following two assignments are typical:

“ASSIGNMENT #1: The Court erred in allowing plaintiff’s counsel to ask leading questions.”
“ASSIGNMENT #3: The Court erred in allowing plaintiffs to erroneously prove damages to the car.”

It will be noted that the exceptions relied upon are not grouped in the assignments of error, and the assignments do not refer to the exceptions upon which they are based.

“While the form of the assignments of error must depend largely upon the circumstances of each case, they…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. EL LOWIE & COMPANY v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  2. Pamlico County v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  3. Rose v. . BankSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Ellis v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
  5. Rose v. Bank of WadesboroSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. General Metals, Inc. v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. JIM WALTER CORPORATION v. GilliamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. In Re the Will of AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  5. Kleinfeldt v. Shoney's of Charlotte, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API