Legal Opinion

Pamlico County v. Davis

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 4, 1959No. 98PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.

Typical of movants’ assignments is the seventh, which reads:

“The trial Court committed prejudicial and reversible error in its charge to the jury by instructing the jury upon the law of better-ments and permanent improvements, in that no evidence upon the instant record justified instructions upon said .law or -the submission to the jury of an issue on a question -of 'betterments and improvements; to which error EXCEPTIONS 9, 10, 11, 12, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, and 20 (R pp 78-85, 92-98) are directed.”

The assignments of error do not conform to Rules 19 (3) and 21 of this Oourt. We have repeatedly…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Steelman v. . BenfieldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1948
  2. Albea v. GriffinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1838
  3. EL LOWIE & COMPANY v. AtkinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  4. Hunt v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  5. Pritchard v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. KirbySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. State v. BaldwinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  3. Beacon Homes, Inc. v. HoltSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Yeager v. DobbinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Balint v. GraysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API