General Metals, Inc. v. Truitt Manufacturing Co.
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtHiggins, J.
The parties waived a jury trial and consented that the presiding judge should hear the evidence, answer the issues raised by the pleadings, and render judgment. The consent order required the trial court to sit as both judge and jury.
In passing on the appeal from the judgment, we may assume, since nothing appears to the contrary, that the careful and experienced presiding judge disregarded any incompetent evidence which may have crept into the record and based his findings exclusively on competent evidencie. Chappell v. Winslow, 258 N.C. 617, 129 S.E. 2d 101; Bizzell v. Bizzell, 247 N.C. 590,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Harris & Harris Construction Co. v. Crain & Denbo, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Bizzell v. BizzellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Bond v. Pickett Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1914
- Eastern Steel Products Corporation v. ChestnuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Nichols v. McFarlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Rose v. Vulcan Materials CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- Dailey v. Integon General Ins. Corp.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1985
- State v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Wood-Hopkins Contracting Co. v. North Carolina State Ports AuthoritySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1974
- Investment Properties of Asheville, Inc. v. AllenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.