Legal Opinion

Ellis v. ATLANTIC COAST LINE RAILROAD COMPANY

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 30, 1955No. 237PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The appellant’s exceptions are not grouped as required by tbe Eules of Practice in tbe Supreme Court, Eule 19 (3), 221 N.C. at page 553, et seq. However, tbe appeal itself will be treated as an exception to tbe judgment, Casualty Co. v. Green, 200 N.C. 535, 157 S.E. 797, but tbe other purported assignments of error which do not comply with our rules, may not be considered. G.S. 1-282; S. v. Bittings, 206 N.C. 798, 175 S.E. 299.

If it be conceded that the plaintiff’s intestate was killed by one of tbe defendant’s trains, tbe evidence is not sufficient to establish tbe fact that be was killed by…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. State v. . BittingsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1934
  2. Bailey v. North Carolina RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  3. Mercer v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  4. Cummings v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1940
  5. Fidelity & Casualty Co. v. GreenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Bridges v. GrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1957
  2. Conrad v. ConradSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Balint v. GraysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
  4. Columbus County v. ThompsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  5. Tillis v. Calvine Cotton Mills, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1956

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API