State ex rel. Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Co. v. Clancy
Montana Supreme Court
Writs of prohibition by the state, on the relation of the Boston & Montana Consolidated Copper & Silver Mining Company and another, against William Clancy, judge of the district court of the S'econd judicial district, and the district court of the said district of Silver B'ow county, and by the state’ on the relation of the same company, against E’.-W. Harney, judge, and another.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Holloway
These causes were heard at the same time, and submitted on the same briefs. As the facts are practically the same’ a statement of one cause will suffice for both.
The petition filed herein alleges that in a certain action pending in the district court of Silver Bow county an injunction was issued and served on these relators, enjoining them from mining ore from certain designated ground. Thereafter an affidavit was filed charging the relators with violating such injunction. An order to show cause why they should not be punished for contempt was issued and served, but before the time *195for the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- New Orleans v. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- In re PierceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1878
- Ex parte GouldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
- Phillips v. WelchNevada Supreme Court · 1876
- In re BuckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by37 opinions
- Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Van Dyke v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1922
- Blodgett v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- State ex rel. Schneider v. CunninghamMontana Supreme Court · 1909
- State ex rel. Carleton v. District CourtMontana Supreme Court · 1905
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.