In re Buckley
California Supreme Court
Proceeding to punish for a contempt of court. The-facts are stated in the opinion of Mr. Justice Thornton.
1Opinion of the CourtThornton, J.
This is a proceeding taken against the respondent, Buckley, for an alleged contempt of this court. The contempt charged relates to the cases of Bonnet v. City and County of San Francisco, and Parker v. City and County of San Francisco, which were pending in this court on appeal before, on and after the tenth day of May, 1884. In each of these causes, judgment of affirmance was rendered by this court on the day last named. These judgments of affirmance were in favor of Bonnet and Parker. The contempt charged is, that on the said day the defendant, well knowing that these causes had been…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- New Orleans v. Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1874
- Cartwright's CaseMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1873
- Ex parte CrittendenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
- In re HoughtonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1885
- Durant v. Washington CountyU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Iowa · 1869
3Cited by39 opinions
- Rose v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1977
- Hotaling v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Bridges v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Oil Workers International Union v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- In Re LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.