Legal Opinion

State v. Flores

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

Decided June 18, 1998No. 97-240-M.PPublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This case came before the Supreme Court on May 5, 1998, pursuant to an order directing the parties to show cause why the issues raised by this petition should not be summarily decided. The petitioner in this case, Daniel Flores (Flores or petitioner), seeks review of a Superior Court ruling 1 that he is required to register as a sex offender. After hearing the arguments of counsel for the parties and reviewing their memoranda, we conclude that cause has not been shown, and that the ease will be decided at this time.

Effective July 24, 1996, the Rhode Island General Assembly enacted a…

3Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  2. Brennan v. KirbySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1987
  3. Doe v. PatakiCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
  4. Kaya v. PartingtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
  5. In Re Advisory to the GovernorSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by41 opinions

  1. State v. SantosSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
  2. Cummings v. ShoreySupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2000
  3. State v. BurkeSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
  4. Town of North Kingstown v. AlbertSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2001
  5. Hanley v. StateSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API