Legal Opinion
Cummings v. Shorey
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
Decided November 16, 2000No. 99-117-AppealPublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LEDERBERG, Justice.
The plaintiff, Carol A. Cummings, appealed to the Rhode Island Supreme Court after her dispute over real estate taxes resulted in a judgment in favor of William H. Shorey (tax assessor or defendant), in his capacity as tax assessor of Middletown, Rhode Island. The plaintiff claimed that taxes on her property had been assessed illegally and that the revaluation was either not certified pursuant to law or was certified late, and she sought a refund of all taxes collected. We disagree and affirm the judgment.
Facts and Procedural History
The plaintiff owns several parcels…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Ornelas v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Rhode Island Ophthalmological Society v. CannonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1974
- State v. DiCiccoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1998
- In Re DenisewichSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1994
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- Tanner v. Town Council of Town of East GreenwichSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Roe v. GelineauSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2002
- Stebbins v. WellsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
- In Re Review of Proposed Town of New Shoreham ProjectSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Auto Body Ass'n of Rhode Island v. State, Department of Business RegulationSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.