State v. Santos
Supreme Court of Rhode Island
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROBINSON, Justice.
At issue in this case is whether a person convicted of sexual assault and incarcerated before July 1, 1992, but released after that date, was required to register as a sexual offender pursuant to the registration statute that was in existence at the time of the prisoner’s release (viz., G.L. 1956 §' 11-37-16 (since repealed by P.L. 1996, ch. 108, § 3)).1 The defendant, Idaho Fernandes Santos, maintains that, because he was convicted before § 11-37-16 went into effect, he was under no duty to register. Accordingly, he asserts that the trial court erred in denying his…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Caminetti v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- Smith v. DoeSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Accent Store Design, Inc. v. Marathon House, Inc.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Kaya v. PartingtonSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1996
- Arnold v. Rhode Island Department of LaborSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2003
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by67 opinions
- Iselin v. Retirement Board of the Employees' Retirement SystemSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2008
- DeMarco v. Travelers Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 2011
- Berman v. SitrinSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2010
- McKenna v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2005
- Smiler v. NapolitanoSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 2006
62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.