Legal Opinion

Fielding v. George A. Hormel & Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 5, 1989No. C2-88-2382PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WAHL, Justice.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals reversing a compensation judge’s denial of wage loss benefits to a disabled employee *14whose employment relationship was disrupted by a union strike. We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand for further proceedings.

In 1980, Thomas J. Fielding sustained a Gillette-type injury1 to both arms, diagnosed as ulnar neuritis, resulting in a 20% permanent partial disability to the right arm and a 10% permanent partial disability to the left arm. Hormel accepted liability and paid workers’ compensation…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  2. Marsolek v. George A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Dorn v. A. J. Chromy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  4. Johnson v. State, Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Mitchell v. White Castle Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lolling v. Midwest PatrolSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1996
  2. Marsolek v. George A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
  3. Arizona Dept. of Public Safety v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Arizona Dept. of Public Safety v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  5. Fielding v. George A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API