Legal Opinion
Marsolek v. George A. Hormel & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 5, 1989No. C1-88-1806PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
COYNE, Justice.
The Workers’ Compensation Court of Appeals, by majority decision, reversed a compensation judge’s award of temporary total benefits. We reverse in part, affirm in part and remand the matter to the compensation judge for relitigation.
The employee-relator, John J. Marsolek, was employed by the George A. Hormel Company meat packing plant in Austin, Minnesota from 1968 through 1985. During his years of work for Hormel, Marsolek suffered several work-related injuries. In September 1981, Marsolek injured his low back. Hormel accepted liability and compensated Marsolek for a 10%…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Schulte v. CH PETERSON CONSTRUCTION COMPANYSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1967
- Dorn v. A. J. Chromy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Johnson v. State, Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Morehouse v. Geo. A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Kurowski v. Kittson Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Seagraves v. Austin Co. of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
- State ex rel. Watts v. Schottenstein Stores Corp.Ohio Supreme Court · 1993
- PDM Molding, Inc. v. StanbergSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Wendt v. North Dakota Workers Compensation BureauNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
- Nederhood v. Cadillac Malleable Iron Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1994
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.