Legal Opinion
Fielding v. George A. Hormel & Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided May 5, 1989No. C2-88-2382Published
1Opinion of the Court
439 N.W.2d 12 (1989)
Thomas J. FIELDING, Respondent,
v.
GEORGE A. HORMEL COMPANY, Self-Insured, Relator,
Minnesota Department of Jobs and Training, Intervenor.
No. C2-88-2382.
Supreme Court of Minnesota.
May 5, 1989.
Michael Forde, Gilmore, Aafedt, Forde, Anderson & Gray, P.A., Minneapolis, for relator.
David Stofferahn, Sieben, Gross, Von Holtum, Carey & McCoy, Ltd., Minneapolis, for respondent.
Considered and decided by the court en banc without oral argument.
WAHL, Justice.
This is an appeal from a decision of the Workers' Compensation Court of Appeals reversing a compensation judge's denial of wage…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gillette v. Harold, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
- Marsolek v. George A. Hormel & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1989
- Dorn v. A. J. Chromy Construction Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
- Johnson v. State, Department of Veterans AffairsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
- Mitchell v. White Castle Systems, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.