Legal Opinion

Mano v. Madden

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 17, 1999PublishedCited by 48 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAUGH, J.:

¶ 1 Ellen B. Madden appeals from the order granting plaintiffs’ motion for a new trial. On appeal, appellant claims that in granting plaintiffs’ motion, the trial court improperly usurped the jury’s role as finder of fact. In the alternative, appellant asserts that if a new trial was warranted, it should not have been limited to the issue of damages. Upon review, we affirm.

¶ 2 On September 21, 1998, at approximately 5:30 p.m., Anthony Mano was stopped in his van at a red fight on City Line Avenue in Philadelphia. Ellen Madden’s vehicle was directly behind Mr. Mano’s van. At…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Holland v. ZelnickSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Rozanc v. UrbanySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Mitchell v. Gravely International, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Cianci v. BurwellSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by48 opinions

  1. Andrews v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Majczyk v. OeschSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Summers v. Giant Food Stores, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  4. Kruczkowska v. WinterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  5. Peterson v. ShreinerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API