Legal Opinion

Summers v. Giant Food Stores, Inc.

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 17, 1999PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEWEN, President Judge:

I. PROCEDURAL POSTURE

¶ 1 These consolidated appeals 1 have been taken from the order which, following a jury verdict in favor of all defendants, Giant Food Stores, Inc. (hereafter “Giant”), Hershocks, Inc. (hereafter “Her-shocks”), and Stanley Magic Door, Inc. (hereafter “Stanley”), granted, in part 2 , the post-trial motion of the plaintiff, Kay Summers (hereafter “Summers”), and ordered a new trial as to the defendant Giant Food Stores, Inc., only. 3 Giant, as appellant' in Appeal No. 637 Harrisburg 1997, challenges the award of a new trial against it, while Summers,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Coker v. SM Flickinger Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Thompson v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  3. Martin v. EvansSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  4. Estate of Swift Ex Rel. Swift v. Northeastern Hospital of PhiladelphiaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997
  5. Riccio v. American Republic InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Gutteridge v. A.P. Green Services, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Hamilton v. Emerson Electric Co.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
  3. Bezerra v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2000
  4. Commonwealth, Department of General Services v. United States Mineral Products Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  5. Rudy v. A-Best Products Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2005

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API