Legal Opinion

Majczyk v. Oesch

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 28, 2001PublishedCited by 67 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

¶ 1 This is an appeal following a jury verdict in favor of the defendant/appellee John Oesch (“appellee”) in a personal injury action resulting from a motor vehicle accident. We affirm. The relevant factual and procedural history, taken from the trial court’s opinion and supported by the record, follows:

On February 25, 1995, Plaintiffs’ vehicle was stopped at a traffic fight on upper Peach Street in front of Defendant’s stopped vehicle. Plaintiff Susan Maje- zyk was the passenger, and Gary Maje-zyk, her husband, was the driver of Plaintiffs’ vehicle. Defendant noticed the light had changed…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Kiser v. SchulteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  2. Neison v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  3. Boggavarapu v. PonistSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  4. Davis v. MullenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
  5. Johnson v. Hyundai Motor AmericaSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by67 opinions

  1. Andrews v. JacksonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2002
  2. Viener v. JacobsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  3. Marsh v. HanleySuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004
  4. Kaufman v. CamposSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2003
  5. Kraner v. KranerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2004

62 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API