Purcell v. Firth
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the' opinion of the court. '
1Opinion of the CourtMelvin, J.
W. J. Purcell, as assignee of Purcell-Sargent Land Company (a copartnership), sued successfully for a commission alleged to have been earned under a contract for the sale of real estate. Defendant appeals from the judgment and from an order denying his motion for a new trial.
It appears from the testimony that L. J. Rose, desiring to purchase a rancho in Imperial County known as “Tract 85, Township 15 S., Range 15 East, S. B. M.,” inquired of Purcell-Sargent Land Company regarding the price for which the property could be purchased. The land belonged to Emil Firth, a resident of Los Angeles.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Phelan v. GardnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1872
- Phelps v. PruschCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
- Justy v. ErroCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
- Smith v. SchieleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- Stanton v. CarnahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Wallace v. ZinmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Oregon Home Builders v. Montgomery Inv. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1919
- Bail v. GlantzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
- Walter v. LibbyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.