Stanton v. Carnahan
California Court of Appeal
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. George H. Hutton, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtShaw, J.
Appeal from judgment. The action was brought to recover $300 upon a provision of a contract entered into between defendant and one Crawford, whereby the latter agreed to sell and the former agreed' to buy the' tract of land therein described for a stipulated sum to be paid at the times and in the manner therein provided, which provision was as follows: “And the buyer (Carnahan, the defendant) agrees to pay Stanton & Welch $300. commission. Seller (Crawford) agrees to pay Stanton & Welch $100 commission when deal is complete.” Defendant in his answer admitted the execution of the contract and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Durfee v. SealeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
3Cited by19 opinions
- Lawless v. CalawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
- Lawrence Block Co. v. PalstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
- Coulter v. HowardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- K. Lundeen Corp. v. BarlowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1932
- Realty Bonds & Finance Co. v. Point Richmond Canal & Land Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.