Legal Opinion

Sinelli v. Ford Motor Co.

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided January 11, 1993No. Civ. H-92-1618PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALEXANDER HARVEY, II, Senior District Judge.

Presently pending in this civil action is defendant’s motion for summary judgment. Plaintiff John Peter Sinelli (hereinafter “Sinelli”) has here sued Ford Motor Company (hereinafter “Ford”), seeking damages for personal injuries sustained by him in a motor vehicle accident. The Court’s jurisdiction over this ease is based solely upon diversity of citizenship. 28 U.S.C. § 1332. Memoranda both in support of and opposition to the pending motion have been filed by the parties and reviewed by the Court. Oral argument on the motion was…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. N. Brown FELTY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. GRAVES-HUMPHREYS COMPANY, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
  4. Ross v. Communications Satellite Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1985
  5. Arnold G. Barwick v. The Celotex Corporation, Keene Corporation, Pittsburgh Corning Corporation, H.K. Porter, Forty-Eight Insulations, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Noonan v. WilliamsDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Cupidon v. AlexisCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
  3. Bowles v. Ford Motor CompanyDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API