Legal Opinion

Noonan v. Williams

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided December 12, 1996No. 95-CV-240PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TERRY, Associate Judge:

Our task in this case is to construe a general release from liability that appellant signed after an automobile accident in which he was injured. We must decide whether an alleged joint tortfeasor (appellee Williams) is discharged from liability when the injured party (appellant Noonan) executes a general release that purports to release not only two other named tortfeasors, but “all other” potentially liable persons. The trial court answered this question in the affirmative and granted summary judgment for Williams. We reverse.

I. The Faots

A taxicab and a private…

2Cases cited76 opinions

  1. Carmichael v. BellerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1996
  2. Colbert v. Georgetown UniversityDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. McKenna v. AustinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1943
  4. 1010 Potomac Associates v. Grocery Manufacturers of America, Inc.District of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1984
  5. Hurt v. Leatherby Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1980

71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Hollins v. Federal National Mortgage Ass'nDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2000
  2. Neverkovec v. FredericksCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
  3. Wreglesworth v. Arctco, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 2000
  4. Convit v. WilsonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Partnership Placements, Inc. v. Landmark InsuranceDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1998

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API