Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Dunlop

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 17, 1947No. Crim. 4058PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KINCAID, J. pro tem.

By information, the appellants Dunlop and Lilly, together with their codefendant, William J. Finley, were charged with the crime of robbery, a felony, which crime was alleged to have been committed in Los Angeles County on or about the 14th day of January, 1946. Dunlop was also charged therein with four prior convictions, Lilly with three prior convictions, and Finley with two prior convictions. Each defendant entered a plea of not guilty of the crime of robbery, but each defendant admitted the prior convictions as charged in the information. After trial by jury, each…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. People v. BestCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1936
  2. People v. FosterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. People v. ColemanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
  4. People v. WhitsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1944
  5. People v. WelshCalifornia Supreme Court · 1936

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. In Re FinleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
  2. People v. DunlopCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
  3. People v. RothCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  4. People v. NeyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965
  5. People v. WilliamsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API