Legal Opinion

The CITY NAT. BANK & TRUST CO. OF SALEM v. Hassler

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 15, 1950PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

9 N.J. Super. 153 (1950)

75 A.2d 546

THE CITY NATIONAL BANK AND TRUST COMPANY OF SALEM, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT,

v.

MORANT HASSLER, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Argued August 28, 1950.

Decided September 15, 1950.

Before Judges JACOBS, BIGELOW and WM. J. BRENNAN, JR.

Mr. Robert W. Richman argued the cause for the appellant.

Mr. Joseph Narrow argued the cause for the respondent (Mr. George S. Friedman, attorney).

The opinion of the court was delivered by JACOBS, S.J.A.D.

The plaintiff bank filed a complaint which alleged that the defendant Hassler had executed a…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schmid v. HainesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1935
  2. Joseph Lande & Son, Inc. v. Wellsco Realty, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1943
  3. Glass v. American Stores Co., Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Sutley v. Polk County State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
  5. Trenton Banking Co. v. WoodruffNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1838

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. 1st Nat'l St. Bank, NJ v. Carlyle House, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1968
  2. Falk v. UngerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955
  3. Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. TrugmanNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1970
  4. Shimp v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API