Legal Opinion
Sutley v. Polk County State Bank
Supreme Court of Minnesota
Decided February 20, 1925No. 24,408PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtQuinn, J.
Action to recover damages for alleged want of proper care of 45 head of cattle while under control of the defendant bank, as mortgagee. Plaintiff had a verdict for the sum of $1,852. From an order denying its motion for judgment in its favor or for a new trial, defendant appealed.
A somewhat detailed statement of facts will tend to a better understanding of the situation and of the issues involved in this lawsuit. In September, 1921, Zack T. Sutley, husband of the plaintiff, was indebted to the defendant bank, of which Charles E. Kiewel was president and James M. Hanson was cashier, in the sum…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Merchants' Bank v. State BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
- Security Savings Bank v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Wing v. Commercial & Savings BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
- Croze v. St. Mary's Canal Mineral Land Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1906
- Huntoon v. BrendemuehlSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Harriet State Bank v. SamelsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1925
- The CITY NAT. BANK & TRUST CO. OF SALEM v. HasslerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1950
- Bankers Life Co. v. Farmers State BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Gotta v. Peoples State BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1932
- Nelson v. Central Metropolitan BankSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1932