Legal Opinion
Roberts, Walsh & Co. v. Trugman
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided April 13, 1970PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
109 N.J. Super. 594 (1970)
264 A.2d 237
ROBERTS, WALSH & COMPANY, PLAINTIFF,
v.
JACK TRUGMAN, CLARA LOEB AND WILLIAM LOEB, DEFENDANTS.
Superior Court of New Jersey, District Court, Essex County.
Decided April 13, 1970.
Mr. Charles B. Turner for plaintiff.
Mr. Jack Trugman argued the cause pro se.
Mr. Benjamin D. Braelow for defendant Clara Loeb.
Mr. Paul R. Lawless for defendant William Loeb (Mr. Nathan A. Whitfield, attorney).
YANOFF, J.D.C.
This is an action brought by a court reporter against an attorney and a husband and wife for the cost of depositions in the case of Loeb v. Loeb, Docket M-7097-63.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- New Jersey Highway Authority v. RennerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1955
- Leitner v. BraenNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Looman Realty Corp. v. Broad Street Nat. Bank of TrentonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Johnson v. HoffmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
- Sweeney v. VenezianoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Free v. Wilmar J. Helric Co.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
- McCorkle v. WeinsteinAppellate Court of Illinois · 1977
- Publicker Industries, Inc. And Continental Distilling Corporation v. Roman Ceramics Corporation, Publicker Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Smart Document Solutions, LLC v. MillerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
- Anheluk v. KubikNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.