Legal Opinion

Schmid v. Haines

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided May 21, 1935PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Heher, J.

The Clementon National Bank sued upon twenty-five promissoiy notes, variously made and endorsed by the defendants, Royden Haines and bis wife, Bertha. Thirteen of the notes were in 'issue at the trial. Royden was the maker of eleven of these; and the Robert Coat Company, Incorporated, a corporation created under the laws of the State of Hew York, was the maker of the remaining two, one of which Royden endorsed. Bertha Haines endorsed all thirteen notes. These notes were discounted by the bank for the coat company; the latter received the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. German American State Bank v. WatsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1917
  2. Vallely v. DevaneyNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1923
  3. First National Bank v. BaerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  4. Niblack v. FarleyIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
  5. Putnam v. ChaseOregon Supreme Court · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Deitrick v. GreaneySupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. Kurtz v. OremlandNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1954
  3. Ferdon v. Zarriello Bros. Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1965
  4. Eckman v. BeihlSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1936
  5. Pellington v. Erie Railroad Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1935

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API