Legal Opinion
Falk v. Unger
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 25, 1955PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
33 N.J. Super. 589 (1955)
111 A.2d 283
HENRY FALK, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT,
v.
DANIEL UNGER, ALEX UNGER, T/A UNGER ELECTRICAL CO. AND LORRAINE DRESS SHOP, DEFENDANTS, AND HOLDER ENGINEERING COMPANY, INC., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.
Argued January 17, 1955.
Decided January 25, 1955.
Before Judges CLAPP, JAYNE and FRANCIS.
Mr. John C. Stockel argued the cause for appellant.
Mr. Arthur J. Sills argued the cause for respondent (Messrs. Wilentz, Goldman, Spitzer & Sills, attorneys).
The opinion of the court was delivered by JAYNE, J.A.D.
It was the negligence of the…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Charles v. . BarrettNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Gentile v. Pub. Service Coordinated TransportNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1951
- Kaufman v. Pennsylvania Railroad Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1949
- Errickson v. F. W. Schwiers, Jr., Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1932
- Beck v. Monmouth Lumber Co.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Murin v. Frapaul Const. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1990
- Viggiano v. Reppenhagen, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1959
- Marchese v. MonacoNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1958
- Landwehr v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
- Poppe v. Taxation Division DirectorNew Jersey Tax Court · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.