City of Wilmington v. Merrick
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.
The principle of caveat emptor applies with all its rigor to the purchase of real estate at a tax sale. Ordinarily, the holder of a tax deed executed pursuant to an invalid commissioner’s sale in a tax foreclosure suit may not obtain reimbursement from the taxing authorities.
The fundamental fairness and soundness of this rule is apparent. One who purchases at a tax sale does so without warranty, — and usually with the expectation of substantial profit. He is chargeable with knowledge that a commissioner’s deed is no more than a quitclaim deed. There “are no implied covenants with respect to…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Perry v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
- Floding v. FlodingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
- City of Wilmington v. MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
- Turpin v. County of JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
- Guy v. First Carolinas Joint Stock Land Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Boone v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
- Edwards v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
- Quevedo v. DeansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Beneficial Mortgage Co. of North Carolina, Inc. v. Barrington & Jones Law Firm, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.