Legal Opinion

City of Wilmington v. Merrick

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 7, 1951No. 596PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJohnson, J.

The principle of caveat emptor applies with all its rigor to the purchase of real estate at a tax sale. Ordinarily, the holder of a tax deed executed pursuant to an invalid commissioner’s sale in a tax foreclosure suit may not obtain reimbursement from the taxing authorities.

The fundamental fairness and soundness of this rule is apparent. One who purchases at a tax sale does so without warranty, — and usually with the expectation of substantial profit. He is chargeable with knowledge that a commissioner’s deed is no more than a quitclaim deed. There “are no implied covenants with respect to…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Perry v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Floding v. FlodingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912
  3. City of Wilmington v. MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Turpin v. County of JacksonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Guy v. First Carolinas Joint Stock Land Bank of ColumbiaSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Boone v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Edwards v. ArnoldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Quevedo v. DeansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Beneficial Mortgage Co. of North Carolina, Inc. v. Barrington & Jones Law Firm, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API