Legal Opinion

Floding v. Floding

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided February 13, 1912PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Action for damages. Before Judge Pendleton. Fulton superior court. May 29, 1911.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. Tbe court did not err in sustaining the general demurrer filed in this case. The contract entered into between the plaintiff and the defendant is as follows:

“Articles of Agreement. Know all men by these presents, that I, Mr. Geo. A. Floding, of the County of Fulton, and the State of Georgia, party of the first part, in consideration of the sum representing the value of all Eegalia Supplies, Machinery, Appliances, .and Materials used in the manufacture and sale of Eegalia, as determined by inventory, to be made at the earliest possible date, do hereby grant, bargain, sell, and convey unto…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Seay v. SpratlingSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  2. Swift v. CrowSupreme Court of Georgia · 1855

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Coca-Cola Bottling Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1920
  2. Adair v. the Traco DivisionSupreme Court of Georgia · 1941
  3. Daniels v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Vendo Company v. LongSupreme Court of Georgia · 1958
  5. Miazza v. Western Union Telegraph Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API