Legal Opinion

Quevedo v. Deans

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 12, 1951No. 674PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarNI-iill, J.

Did the court err (1) in making additional findings of' fact, and (2) in holding that the plaintiffs are the owners of the land in controversy? These are the questions the defendants pose for decision.. Each must be answered in the negative.

As the cause came on for hearing before the trial judge on exceptions to the report of the referee, he was not bound by the findings of fact or- conclusions of law made by the referee. Instead he, in the exercise of his supervisory power, was vested with full authority to amend, modify, set aside, confirm, or disaffirm the report. This included the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  2. Eason v. SpenceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. Powell v. . TurpinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  4. Board of Com'rs of Roxboro v. BumpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  5. Graham v. . FloydSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1938

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boone v. SparrowSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. Page v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  3. Hall v. City of FayettevilleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
  4. Beneficial Mortgage Co. of North Carolina, Inc. v. Barrington & Jones Law Firm, P.A.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  5. BENEFICIAL MORTGAGE CO. OF NORTH CAROLINA INC. v. BarringtonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API