City of Wilmington v. Merrick
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtBarnhill, J.
Tbe many alleged defects in the proceeding appearing on the face of this record invite much writing which in the end would serve no useful purpose. In the final analysis the appeal presents two questions: (1) Were the movants made parties defendant herein so that fhey are hound by the judgment entered, and, if not, (2) Did they, by their general appearance and motion to vacate the judgment, waive the defect? ¥e are constrained to answer each question in the negative?
It must he noted in the beginning that this is an action instituted under the provisions of C.S. 7990, now G.S. 105-414. It is…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- City of Monroe v. NivenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
- Jones v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1911
- Riddick v. . DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
- Comrs. of Washington v. . GainesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
3Cited by8 opinions
- Board of Com'rs of Roxboro v. BumpassSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Page v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- City of Wilmington v. MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Quevedo v. DeansSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
- Baker v. MurphreySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.