Legal Opinion

Turpin v. County of Jackson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 19, 1945PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The question presented for determination on this appeal is whether or not the grantees in a quitclaim deed may recover the consideration paid therefor, in the event a paramount title to said lands was outstanding in a third party or parties at the time of the execution of the conveyance and the grantees have been evicted by the holder or holders of the paramount title. In the absence of fraud or mistake, our decisions answer this question in tbe negative.

The conveyance executed on behalf of the county of Jackson did not purport to convey the lands described therein, but merely whatever right,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Phillips Walsh v. . Rufus D. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1872
  2. Coble v. . BarringerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Cook v. . SinkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  4. Smathers v. . GilmerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1900
  5. Slack v. McLaganIllinois Supreme Court · 1853

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Kelly v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. City of Wilmington v. MerrickSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  3. Queen v. SiskSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
  4. Talman v. DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
  5. Olds v. . Cedar WorksSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API