Hall v. Committee of Bar Examiners
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
TOBRINER, J.
Willis Burdette Hall seeks review of the action of the Committee of Bar Examiners of the State Bar (Committee) denying him certification to this court for admission to the bar on the ground that he lacks the “good moral character” required for such admission. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6060, subd. (c); Rules Regulating Admission to Practice Law, rule X, § 101(a).)1
In reaching its decision to exclude Hall from the practice of law, the Committee relied heavily on its premise that Hall had failed to demonstrate adequate “remorse” for conduct in which he had engaged in managing an…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Konigsberg v. State Bar of Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
- Toll v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- March v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1967
- Siegel v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Maltaman v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Martin B. v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Hightower v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Kwasnik v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Pacheco v. State BarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.