Legal Opinion

Kwasnik v. State Bar

California Supreme Court

Decided May 31, 1990No. S010199PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1064Opinion

THE COURT.

Petitioner Richard E. Kwasnik seeks review of the refusal of the State Bar to certify him to this court for admission to the bar on the ground that he lacks the requisite good moral character. (Bus. & Prof. Code, § 6066; Cal. Rules of Court, rule 952(c); Rules Regulating Admission to Practice Law, rule I, § 11.)1 For the reasons set forth below, we conclude petitioner should be admitted to the bar.

Facts

Petitioner graduated from Brooklyn Law School in June 1966. He was admitted to the practice of law in New York in 1967.

In November 1970 petitioner was involved in an automobile…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Kelly v. RobinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Perez. v. CampbellSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Hallinan v. Committee of Bar ExaminersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  4. In Re KreamerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Grimes v. HoschlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Carlson v. Attorney Registration & Disciplinary Commission of the Supreme Court of Illinois (In Re Carlson)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 1996
  3. In Re MennaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Morrow v. Torrance Bank (In Re Morrow)United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1995
  5. In Re PolinDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1991

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API