Legal Opinion

Second National Bank of New Haven v. Loftus

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 10, 1936PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinman, J.

The complaint sought recovery for three months rent under a lease of an apartment in a building in New Haven. The defendant pleaded, as a special defense, that as the building was a tenement house occupied for human habitation “and no building certificate was ever issued in compliance with § 2592 of the General Statutes, therefore the plaintiff, under § 2593, is not entitled to recover.” A demurrer to this defense was overruled (Munger, J.) and on the trial the court held the plaintiff to be within the terms of § 2593 and rendered judgment for the defendant. Sections 2592 and 2593 are part of…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of the United States · 1929
  2. Silver v. SilverSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1928
  3. Griffith v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1910
  4. Bankers Trust Co. v. BlodgettSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1921
  5. State v. GriffithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Lyman v. AdornoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1947
  2. DePAUL v. KauffmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1971
  3. Murphy, Inc. v. Town of WestportSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1944
  4. United Aircraft Corporation v. FusariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
  5. State v. ZazzaroSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1941

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API