Legal Opinion

DePAUL v. Kauffman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 7, 1971No. Appeal, 329PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Roberts,

This Court is urged by this appeal to hold unconstitutional the Pennsylvania Rent Withholding Act, Act of January 21, 1966, P. L. (1965) 1531, §1, as amended, 35 P.S. §1700-1 (Supp. 1970). We are unpersuaded and hold that Act to be a valid exercise of the Commonwealth’s police power.

*389According to the terms of tbe Bent Withholding Act,1 if a city certifies a dwelling as “unfit for human habitation”, the tenant’s rental obligation is suspended until the dwelling is re-certified as “fit” or until the tenancy is terminated for a reason other than the nonpayment of…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. American Power & Light Co. v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  4. Block v. HirshSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  5. Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. Wm. Penn Parking Garage, Inc. v. City of PittsburghSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Tosto v. Pennsylvania Nursing Home Loan AgencySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Ruzzi v. Butler Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Wilmington Trust Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. TW Phillips Gas and Oil Co. v. JedlickaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2012

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API