Legal Opinion

MacK v. United States Gypsum Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 26, 1926No. Appeal, 197PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Plaintiff, Edward Mack, was employed by a builder to do common labor in the erection of an apartment house. During the course of the construction of this building, defendant company operated a hoist, such as is commonly used to carry materials to and from upper floors of structures in course of erection. Running along the outside of the building, at the level of the third floor, was a scaffold platform, through which the hoist shaft extended. The platform was six feet wide, except where it passed this shaft; there it was but two feet wide, the remaining four feet being occupied by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Harkins v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Maue v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1925

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Pfendler v. SpeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Lithgow v. LithgowSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  3. Snyder v. Penn Liberty Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Reardon v. SmithSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  5. Dickey v. Boggs & Buhl, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API