Legal Opinion

Maue v. Pittsburgh Rys. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 8, 1925No. Appeal, 144PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Me. Justice Schaffee,

In this case and the one following brought to recover damages for personal injuries growing out of the same accident, the plaintiffs recovered verdicts which were set aside by the court in banc on the ground that the incontrovertible physical facts showed that the accident could not have taken place in the way plaintiffs and their witnesses said it happened and judgments were entered for defendant; in each case the plaintiff has appealed.

Both plaintiffs were police officers in the City of Pittsburgh. Notice was received at the station house to which they were…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Seiwell v. HinesSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  3. Horen v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Zandras v. MoffettSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  2. Lamp v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Snyder v. Penn Liberty Refining Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930
  4. Commonwealth v. NewmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. MacK v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API