Legal Opinion

Reardon v. Smith

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided November 29, 1929No. Appeal, 277PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Frazer,

The jury having returned a verdict for plaintiff, defendant appeals from refusal of the court below to either enter judgment n. o. v. in his favor, or grant a new trial This refusal and the rejection by the trial judge of a motion for binding instructions form the basis of appellant’s two assignments of error.

The facts and circumstances of the accident by which the husband of plaintiff suffered injuries that resulted in his death are not confusing. Reardon, a man of good health and habits was employed as watchman at the Baldwin Locomotive Works in the City of…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. McAvoy v. KromerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Ferry v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911
  3. Miller v. SiebertSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. MacK v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
  5. Madden v. Lehigh Valley RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Pfendler v. SpeerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Sajatovich v. Traction Bus Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Commonwealth v. GillSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  4. Rowles v. EvanuikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  5. Alleva v. PorterSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1957

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API