Harkins v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
Per Curiam,
The court below directed a verdict for defendant, judgment was entered thereon, and plaintiffs have appealed.
Anna Harkins, wife of the other plaintiff, Philip S. Harkins, testified that she was a passenger on one of defendant’s street cars; she arose to pay her fare, handed the conductor a dollar, and, while waiting for change, the car stopped with a jerk and she was thrown and injured. There is nothing in the evidence to show that any other passenger was affected by the alleged jerk of the car; in fact, no effort was made by plaintiff to describe the atténding circumstances, to…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Uffelman v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916
- Zieger v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1924
3Cited by11 opinions
- Smith Et Ux. v. Pittsburghi Rys. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
- Endicott v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
- MacK v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1926
- Hill v. West Penn Railways Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940
- Harrar v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.