Legal Opinion

Snyder v. Penn Liberty Refining Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 7, 1930No. Appeals, 150 and 151PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Kephart,

This is an appeal by defendant from a refusal to grant a judgment n. o. v. Anthony Snyder, a minor, nineteen years old, was injured as a result of being struck by a motor truck of appellant. Snyder was a helper on Gimbel’s delivery wagon which was delivering a roll of linoleum to the O’Brien home. The wagon had stopped, close to the curb, on the side of the street opposite the O’Brien home. The street has two car tracks with a six-foot space between, and between the outside rails and the curbs there is sufficient distance to permit the pas sage of automobiles.…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Lessig v. Reading Transit & Light Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  2. Hill v. Philadelphia Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1921
  3. Hunter v. PopeSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1927
  4. Horen v. DavisSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1922
  5. Bernstein v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1916

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Pope v. Reading CompanySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  2. Delair v. McAdooSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  3. Hegarty v. BergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  4. Ross v. RiffleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  5. Schaeffer v. Reading Transit Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1930

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API