Legal Opinion
Marriage of Riley v. Riley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 11, 1985No. C2-84-1837PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
Mary Riley brought this appeal from a dissolution judgment, contending that the trial court failed to properly determine the marital nature of certain property, failed to divide the property equitably, awarded inadequate child support, and erred in failing to award her maintenance.
Respondent also seeks review of the judgment, contending that the court awarded excessive child support and erred in awarding attorney fees to appellant.
FACTS
The parties were married on June 4, 1978, a second marriage for both of them. Respondent John Riley is age 45 and appellant Mary Riley is…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Bogen v. BogenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1977
- Bollenbach v. BollenbachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
- Wallin v. WallinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1971
- Marriage of McClelland v. McClellandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Marriage of Cummings v. CummingsCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Falk v. Hecker (In Re Falk)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Minnesota · 1988
- Justis v. JustisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Pekarek v. PekarekCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
- Marriage of Riley v. RileyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.