Marriage of Riley v. Riley
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CRIPPEN, Judge.
This is the second appeal of this dissolution matter. Previously, this court affirmed the trial court’s orders regarding the property settlement, but reversed and remanded on the issues of maintenance and child support because the trial court failed to make adequate findings explaining its decision to deny maintenance and to deviate upward from the child support guidelines. See Riley v. Riley, 369 N.W.2d 40 (Minn.Ct.App.1985), pet. for rev. denied, (Minn. Aug. 29, 1985). On remand, the trial court issued additional findings and reaffirmed its initial decision. Mary Riley…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Marriage of Erlandson v. ErlandsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
- Letourneau v. LetourneauCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Reck v. ReckCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
- Marriage of Linderman v. LindermanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
- Marriage of Otte v. OtteCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In Re the Marriage of BaculisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1988
- In Re AubeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
- Dick v. DickNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989
- Dasher v. DasherSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
- Casey v. CaseySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1993
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.