Legal Opinion

Pekarek v. Pekarek

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided March 25, 1986No. C2-85-1279PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CRIPPEN, Judge.

During the course of the marriage, the parties adopted three children. In the dissolution decree, the trial court placed the children with their father. The trial court also distributed the parties’ property and awarded maintenance and child support. Jean Pekarek appeals from the order. We affirm as modified.

FACTS

The parties were married in 1970 and the marriage was dissolved in 1985. They have three dependent children: David, born November 19, 1976; Heather, born July 25, 1974, and Holly, born September 13, 1973.

I. Custody

Each of the parties sought custody of the three…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Marriage of Pikula v. PikulaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  2. Marriage of Taylor v. TaylorSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1983
  3. Van De Loo v. Van De LooCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  4. Marriage of Kreidler v. KreidlerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Berndt v. BerndtSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In the Interest of A.A.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 2008
  2. Marriage of Olsen v. OlsenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Marriage of Jorschumb v. JorschumbCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986
  4. Marriage of Kennedy v. KennedyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
  5. Marriage of Petersen v. PetersenCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API