Legal Opinion
Doe v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 21, 2005No. CIV.A. 03-1789 (GK/JPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM ORDER
FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.
This case was referred to me by Judge Kessler to resolve all discovery disputes. Currently pending and ready for resolution is Defendant’s Motion to Order John Doe to Submit to an Independent Medical Examination (“Def.’s Mot.”) [# 173]. For the rea- ■ sons stated herein, it is, hereby, ORDERED that the motion is GRANTED.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Plaintiff John Doe, a minor child, alleges, through his next friend Bob Doe, that he was physically and sexually abused while in the care and control of the District of Columbia, in violation of…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- James J. Acosta, Sr. v. Tenneco Oil Company and Mobil Oil CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
- Smith v. KoplanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003
- Stewart v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1995
- Melhorn v. New Jersey Transit Rail Operations, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ornelas v. Southern Tire Mart, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2013
- Nuskey v. LambrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Roberson v. BairDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Benham v. RiceDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Allen v. DiazDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2023