Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Burlington Northern Railroad

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 6, 1995No. Civ. No. 5-94-153PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM ORDER ERICKSON, United States Magistrate Judge.

I. Introduction

This matter came before the undersigned United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to a general assignment, made in accordance with the provisions of Title 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A), upon the Defendant’s Motion to Compel a Rule 35 orthopedic examination of the Plaintiff.

A Hearing on the Motion was conducted on July 6, 1995, at which time the Plaintiff appeared by Paul A Strandness, Esq., and the Defendant appeared by Patrick J. Sweeney, Esq.

For reasons which follow, we deny the Motion to Compel.

II. Discussion

This action was…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Tomlin v. HolecekDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
  2. Peters v. NelsonDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1994
  3. Looney v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1992

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. O'Sullivan v. StateDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1997
  2. Sauer v. Burlington Northern RailroadDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1996
  3. Doe v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  4. Emergency Medicine Associates of Jackson, PLLC v. Glover Ex Rel. GloverCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016
  5. Emergency Medicine Associates of Jackson, PLLC v. Glover Ex Rel. GloverCourt of Appeals of Mississippi · 2016

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API