Legal Opinion

Benham v. Rice

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided September 14, 2006No. CA No. 03-1127 (HHK/JMF)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

FACCIOLA, United States Magistrate Judge.

This case was referred to me for discovery. Currently pending and ready for resolution are six motions. Each will be considered in turn.

I. Plaintiffs Motion to Strike Defendant’s Defenses for Failure to Provide Discovery, to Compel Defendant’s Responsive Answers to Plaintiffs Discovery Demands, and to Extend Plaintiffs Discovery Period, and to Bar Witnesses Not Named in Defendant’s 26(a) Discovery and Points and Authorities Thereof [# 43]

In two memorandum opinions, Judge Kennedy has set forth the fundamental facts of this case and the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  2. Turner v. Imperial StoresDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1995
  3. Zabkowicz v. West Bend Co.District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1984
  4. Fox v. Gates Corp.District Court, D. Colorado · 1998
  5. Shepherd v. American Broadcasting Companies, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 1993

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Nuskey v. LambrightDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
  2. Roberson v. BairDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
  3. Moore v. GarnandDistrict Court, D. Arizona · 2021
  4. Tokhi v. Rite Aid CorporationDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API