Republic of China v. Chang
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
WOOD (Parker), J.
Defendant appeals' (1) from an ex parte order appointing a receiver, and (2) from the order confirming said appointment. He contends that it was error to appoint a receiver. He argues that: there was no statutory provision authorizing the appointment of a receiver in this kind of action; a writ of attachment could have been issued herein ■ the affidavit in support of the application for appointment of a receiver was insufficient; and the complaint did not state a cause of action.
The complaint alleges three causes of action. The first cause of action alleges that: in February,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
- Davies v. RamsdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
- Stowe v. MatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
- Armbrust v. ArmbrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Associated Creditors' Agency v. WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- Sachs v. KilleenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
- Razuki v. Malan CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021