Legal Opinion

Republic of China v. Chang

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 24, 1955No. Civ. 20592PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOOD (Parker), J.

Defendant appeals' (1) from an ex parte order appointing a receiver, and (2) from the order confirming said appointment. He contends that it was error to appoint a receiver. He argues that: there was no statutory provision authorizing the appointment of a receiver in this kind of action; a writ of attachment could have been issued herein ■ the affidavit in support of the application for appointment of a receiver was insufficient; and the complaint did not state a cause of action.

The complaint alleges three causes of action. The first cause of action alleges that: in February,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Goes v. PerryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
  2. Stone v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1931
  3. Davies v. RamsdellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Stowe v. MatsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1949
  5. Armbrust v. ArmbrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Associated Creditors' Agency v. WongCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. Sachs v. KilleenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958
  3. Razuki v. Malan CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API