Legal Opinion
Associated Creditors' Agency v. Wong
California Court of Appeal
Decided May 13, 1963No. Civ. 20711PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDevine, J.
The question in this case is whether there is substantial evidence to support the finding that respondents Delight Wong and Stanley Mah were not partners in a firm purchasing supplies and insurance from plaintiffs’ assignors within four years prior to the filing of the complaints, the earliest of which was on January 29, 1957.
Facts and Law Relating to Alleged Partnership
In 1948, about 140 persons, including respondents, formed a firm with Henry Wong, patriarch of the enterprise, and shares of “stock” were sold to all without benefit of permit by the Commissioner of Corporations. It was called…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Spier v. LangCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
- Coleman v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1956
- Armbrust v. ArmbrustCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
- Williamson v. WilsonIdaho Supreme Court · 1935
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jackson v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
- Prilliman v. United Air Lines, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Ng v. HudsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1977
- Rosenthal v. RosenthalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Redman v. WaltersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.